Subscribe
Home
Issues
Latest Issue
Issue Archive
Special Issues
2022 Midyear Review: Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
2022 Oncology Biosimilar Guide to Patient Support Services
2022 Breast Cancer Guide to Patient Support Services
Browse By Topic
Practice Management
Financial Management
Reimbursement
Health Policy
Quality Care
ICD Codes
Survivorship
FDA Approvals, News & Updates
In the News
Guide to Patient Support Services
Index
Introduction
2023 Spotlight
Conference Correspondent
ASCO 2022 - Wrap Up
NSCLC IO 2022 - Midyear Review
SABCS 2021 Wrap-Up
Dual IO 2021 Year in Review
Web Exclusives
Web Exclusive Articles
Videos
Interview with the Innovators
Webinars
Rapid Reactions
In the News
Quick Quiz
Multiple Myeloma Monthly Minutes
Melanoma Monthly Minutes
Press Releases
Women's Health Monthly Minutes
Lung Cancer Monthly Minutes
Gastrointestinal Cancer Monthly Minutes
Issues
2015
December 2015, Vol 5, No 9
Medicare Will Begin Reimbursing for Advance Care Planning Discussions in 2016
Reimbursement
Rosemary Frei, MSc
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)’s planned reimbursement of advance care planning services in 2016 is being greeted with enthusiasm by the oncology community. Advance care planning comprises the discussion of options for palliative care, end-of-life care, and advance directives. The October 30, 2015, final rule issued by CMS for 2016 introduces reimbursement for advance care planning, which is particularly relevant to providers in the oncology team. CMS will now pay for advance care planning services at each “Annual Wellness Visit,” in addition to other times when it is deemed necessary.
1
“In [these] other contexts, Medicare will only pay for advance care planning when the services are medically reasonable and necessary,” a CMS spokesperson told Oncology Practice Management. “CMS believes that beneficiaries who have had advance care planning and are satisfied with their advance directives are unlikely to engage physicians to provide this service repeatedly. Beneficiaries are always free to alter their care preferences, including any decisions they have made regarding advance directives.”
Advance Care Planning in Oncology
The changes also include reimbursement for more than 1 provider for advance care planning services. Robin T. Zon, MD, Immediate Past Chair, American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Committee, and Chair, Finance and Quality Committees, Michiana Hematology-Oncology, IN, conveyed her enthusiasm for the changes. Dr Zon said that the multiple-provider reimbursement will mean that beneficiaries can get more information before making decisions about complex clinical issues, such as cancer treatment and end-of-life care. She also said that adding reimbursement for more than 1 advance care planning discussion will pay significant dividends to patients. “If physicians are encouraged to deliver ACP [advance care planning] earlier in the disease process of cancer, for example, and they define the goals of treatment very early on—including the expectations and the options—then we may be able to avoid unwanted or undesired treatments up front rather than later in the game, and better comply with the wishes of the patient,” said Dr Zon. She said the options can and should be explored, particularly now that advance care planning services will be provided more routinely. These discussions will now be reimbursed and include services such as symptom-directed treatment with hospice or palliative care, and the avoidance of futile cancer treatment at end of life. “Sometimes patients don’t realize they have the option of hospice, or are fearful of it, as they believe hospice means an immediate death sentence when offered as an intervention,” said Dr Zon. “But there are many of my patients who receive hospice care for months at a time. As a result, they experience better symptom control and quality of life with hospice care, which is often an outpatient service based in the home.” The new Medicare reimbursement rule for advance care planning means that advance care planning services can also be billed for nonphysician providers, including physician assistants and nurse practitioners, and for providers’ staff when they are incident to the physician services but directly supervised by the physician. Many groups and individuals who commented before the finalization of the rule asked that CMS issue a national coverage decision, but the organization demurred. In the interim, Medicare Administrative Contractors will be responsible for local coverage decisions. “We believe it may be advantageous to allow time for implementation and experience with ACP services, including identification of any variation in utilization, prior to considering a controlling national coverage policy through the National Coverage Determination process,” the final rule states.
2
The Current Procedural Terminology billing codes for advance care planning services are 99497 for the first 30 minutes and 99498 for each additional 30 minutes.
2
References
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Proposed policy, payment, and quality provisions changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for calendar year 2016. Fact sheet. October 30, 2015. www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2015-Fact-sheets-items/2015-10-30-2.html. Accessed November 11, 2015.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the Physician Fee Schedule and other revisions to Part B for CY 2016. Final rule with comment period. Fed Regist. 2015;80:70885-71386.
Related Articles
Dispelling Misconceptions About HCC Coding
By
Karyn M. Dyehouse, MD
September 2018, Vol 8, No 9
Coding and Billing
,
Reimbursement
Medications Used for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer and Associated ICD-10 Coding
By
Kristin A. Esposito, CPhT
December 2017, Vol 7, No 12
Cancer Drug Coding
,
ICD Codes
,
Reimbursement
Medications Used for the Treatment of Lung Cancer and Associated ICD-10 Coding
By
Kristin A. Esposito, CPhT
November 2017, Vol 7, No 11
Cancer Drug Coding
,
ICD Codes
,
Reimbursement
How Your Oncology Practice Can Thrive with MACRA: Get Ready for the Quality Payment Program
By
Meg Barbor, MPH
October 2017, Vol 7, No 10
Reimbursement
View the Latest Issue of OPM
Read Issue
Top Trending Articles
1.
Specialty Carve-Outs: What Are the Implications for Patients and Practices?
By
Dawn Holcombe, MBA, FACMPE, ACHE
2.
New Policies Regarding Intravenous Iron Replacement Are Creating Conundrum for Providers and Payers
By
Dawn Holcombe, MBA, FACMPE, ACHE
3.
2023 Spotlight: Amgen
Home
Issues
Latest Issue
Issue Archive
Special Issues
2022 Midyear Review: Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
2022 Oncology Biosimilar Guide to Patient Support Services
2022 Breast Cancer Guide to Patient Support Services
Browse By Topic
Practice Management
Financial Management
Reimbursement
Health Policy
Quality Care
ICD Codes
Survivorship
FDA Approvals, News & Updates
In the News
Guide to Patient Support Services
Index
Introduction
2023 Spotlight
Conference Correspondent
ASCO 2022 - Wrap Up
NSCLC IO 2022 - Midyear Review
SABCS 2021 Wrap-Up
Dual IO 2021 Year in Review
Web Exclusives
Web Exclusive Articles
Videos
Interview with the Innovators
Webinars
Rapid Reactions
In the News
Quick Quiz
Multiple Myeloma Monthly Minutes
Melanoma Monthly Minutes
Press Releases
Women's Health Monthly Minutes
Lung Cancer Monthly Minutes
Gastrointestinal Cancer Monthly Minutes